International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (1):71-92 (2018)
Abstract |
Modal Arguments in the philosophy of mind purport to show that the body is not necessary for a human person’s existence. The key premise in these arguments are generally supported with thought experiments. I argue that Christians endorsing the Doctrine of the Resurrection have good reason to deny this key premise. Traditional Christianity affirms that eschatological human existence is an embodied existence in the very bodies we inhabited while alive. The raises the Resurrection Question: why would God go through the trouble of resurrecting those bodies? I argue that adequately answering this question requires give up on Modal Arguments within the philosophy of mind.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11153-017-9639-9 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering.Eleonore Stump - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):592-598.
The Possibility of Resurrection.Peter Van Inwagen - 1978 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (2):114-121.
View all 38 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pruss, Motivational Centrality, and Probabilities Attached to Possibility Premises in Modal Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):65-85.
Why a Bodily Resurrection?: The Bodily Resurrection and the Mind/Body Relation.Mugg Joshua & James T. Turner Jr - 2017 - Journal of Analytic Theology 5:121-144.
Why a Bodily Resurrection?: The Bodily Resurrection and the Mind/Body Relation.Joshua Mugg & James T. Turner - 2017 - Journal of Analytic Theology 5:121-144.
The Resurrection of the Body.Trenton Merricks - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press.
Modified Gaunilo-Type Objections Against Modal Ontological Arguments.Chlastawa Daniel - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):113--126.
Burdens of Proof: Why Modal Ontological Arguments Aren’T Convincing.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
The Inconceivable Popularity of Conceivability Arguments.Douglas I. Campbell, Jack Copeland & Zhuo-Ran Deng - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (267):223-240.
Swinburne’s Modal Argument for the Existence of a Soul: Formalization and Criticism.Rafal Urbaniak & Agnieszka Rostalska - 2009 - Philo 12 (1):73-88.
Swinburne’s Modal Argument for Dualism: Epistemically Circular.William Hasker - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):366-370.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-08-09
Total views
27 ( #423,291 of 2,507,015 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,105 of 2,507,015 )
2017-08-09
Total views
27 ( #423,291 of 2,507,015 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,105 of 2,507,015 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads