- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Disability Critique of the Comparative View
American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):40-42 (2024)
Abstract
In “Reasons and Reproduction: Gene Editing and Genetic Selection,” McMahan and Savulescu (2024) contest the common notion that embryo selection is a morally better way of avoiding genetic condition...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reasons and Reproduction: Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.Jeff McMahan & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):9-19.
Gene Editing, Genetic Selection, and Reasons That Matter.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):27-29.
Better than what?: embryo selection, gene editing, and evaluative counterfactuals.Harry R. Lloyd - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):55-57.
Medical Treatment, Genetic Selection, and Gene Editing: Beyond the Distinction Between Person-Affecting and Impersonal Reasons.Tomasz Żuradzki - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):50-52.
Embryo Gene Editing is Not Morally Better than Selection Even If Person-Affecting.Tina Rulli - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):20-22.
What’s the Alternative? Comparative Benefits in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):24-26.
Gene Editing vs. Genetic Selection.Ralf Bader Université de Fribourg - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):31-34.
From CRISPR to Conscience: Ethical Dilemmas in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.Shu Ishida & Tsutomu Sawai - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):67-70.
Place-Based Thoughtfulness and Decision-Making in Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.Andrew Crowden & Matthew Gildersleeve - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):53-55.
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-08-30
Downloads
9 (#1,549,643)
6 months
9 (#429,548)
2024-08-30
Downloads
9 (#1,549,643)
6 months
9 (#429,548)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Reasons and Reproduction: Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.Jeff McMahan & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):9-19.
Disability Rights as a Necessary Framework for Crisis Standards of Care and the Future of Health Care.Laura Guidry-Grimes, Katie Savin, Joseph A. Stramondo, Joel Michael Reynolds, Marina Tsaplina, Teresa Blankmeyer Burke, Angela Ballantyne, Eva Feder Kittay, Devan Stahl, Jackie Leach Scully, Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, Anita Tarzian, Doron Dorfman & Joseph J. Fins - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (3):28-32.
The Shifting Landscape of Prenatal Testing: Between Reproductive Autonomy and Public Health.Vardit Ravitsky - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (s3):S34-S40.
A critical view on using “life not worth living” in the bioethics of assisted reproduction.Agnes Elisabeth Kandlbinder - 2024 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 27 (2):189-203.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6f97f49787-zrclg uwo