Women: A more balanced brain?

Zygon 31 (3):421-439 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the basis of knowledge prior to 1988, Ashbrook pointed out that whereas most men are primarily dependent on the left cerebral hemisphere (“dominant hemisphere”) for verbally related functions, women show a greater hemispheric balance in this respect. For men, he argues, their possession of a “speaking” and a “non‐speaking hemisphere” results in a positive‐negative, bipolar way of thinking that may be characterized as dualistic and dialectically hierarchical. In contrast, the greater balance of hemispheric function in women appears to promote greater generalization and synthesis in their thinking.In this article I cite more recent neuroanatomical and brain imaging studies that provide further evidence of disparities in structure and function of the brains of men and women. As background for an attempt to explain these differences, I give a brief review of the triune evolution of the mammalian brain leading up to the human cerebrum. It is of major significance that the female has played a central role in mammalian evolution for more than 180 million years and that the evolutionary transition from reptilian therapsids to mammals is characterized by the develoment of (1) nursing conjoined with maternal care; (2) audiovocal communication or aiding mother‐offspring contact; and (3) play. In human beings, the infant‐carrying hypothesis suggests one means by which, over generations, certain parts of a woman's right hemisphere could undergo functional and eventual anatomical expansion. The mother‐infant communication of basic mammalian sounds with vowel and consonant components suggests a basis for the origination of speech.Finally, in an expansion of Ashbrook's original thesis, we arrive at the rovocative consideration that, unlike men, with their dialectical reasoning, women, with their more balanced brain, are provided with a trialectial ladder for climbing to achieve knowledge. In terms of quantum mechanics, the particle and wave would correspond to the substance and strength of the sides of the ladder, and the derived psychic information (which is neither matter nor energy) would compare to the rungs in between.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

But what would a balanced approach look like?David Dunning - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):332-333.
How women compete.Elizabeth Cashdan - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):221-221.
Brain evolution by natural selection.Toru Shimizu - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):23-24.
Additional requirements for a balanced social psychology.Siu L. Chow - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):329-331.
Violence, sex, and the good mother.Stephen Beckerman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):215-216.
Why women must guard and rule in Plato's kallipolis.Catherine Mckeen - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):527–548.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
50 (#311,977)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey.Jeannette McGlone - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2):215-227.
Medicine, Mind, and the Double Brain.Anne Harrington - 1989 - Journal of the History of Biology 22 (1):177-178.

Add more references