Competing Enlightenment Narratives: A Case Study Of Rorty’s Anti-Kantianism

Cambridge Scholar Publishers (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides a defense of the ethical/political dimensions of Kant’s liberalism by gauging the strength of the critique of one of its most acerbic contemporary critics, Richard Rorty. Rorty’s dissatisfaction with Kant’s position can be traced back to a narrative of the coming to age of our culture, which bears surprising similarities to Kant’s account of the Enlightenment. Yet, in Rorty’s version of the story, Kant’s philosophy is mistakenly assimilated to a form of “Platonism.” This is due, I argue, to the fact that Rorty confuses the “transcendental” with the “transcendent” in Kant. To set the score straight, I present a “de-Platonized” reading of Kant’s 1784 Enlightenment essay, whose goal is to protect the achievements of liberalism against Rorty’s poetic excesses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-18

Downloads
12 (#929,749)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pablo Muchnik
Emerson College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references