Confirming the links between socio-economic variables and digitalization worldwide: the unsettled debate on digital divide

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 18 (3):415-430 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to statistically verify the links of income and education with information and communication technology diffusion across 191 countries of the world taking into account a total of 9 indicators best representing the socio-economic variables. Design/methodology/approach Multivariate regression analysis was used as a prime method to rigorously test the relationships of income and education with ICT diffusion across 191 countries. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences was used to analyze and predict patterns in the data. Findings The results support the hypotheses that income and education are positively related to ICT diffusion. The findings statistically confirm that poverty is a leading cause of digital divide worldwide. Research limitations/implications Academic, policy and practice groups should work in collaboration to fight against digital divide. Present results also imply that digital divide shall never end but rather it can be controlled to an extent with multiple collaborative efforts. Originality/value Prior research assignments on the digital divide concentrate on exploring the links between few socio-economic and ICT variables in select few regions theoretically. The present work addresses this literature gap by developing and testing two hypotheses to statistically investigate the relationships between a broad set of socio-economic and ICT indicators.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical gaps in studies of the digital divide.Kenneth L. Hacker & Shana M. Mason - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (2):99-115.
The "Digital Divide" Is Not a Problem in Need of Rectifying.Walter Block - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):393 - 406.
The tragedy of the digital commons.Gian Maria Greco & Luciano Floridi - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):73-81.
E-exclusion and the Gender Digital Divide.Georgia Foteinou - 2010 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 40 (3):50-61.
Power and the digital divide.Jeremy Moss - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (2):159-165.
The “digital divide” is not a problem in need of rectifying.Walter Block - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):393-406.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-05

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Power and the digital divide.Jeremy Moss - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (2):159-165.
Ethical reflections on the digital divide.Herman T. Tavani - 2003 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 1 (2):99-108.
Reassessing social inclusion and digital divides.Saheer Al-Jaghoub & Chris Westrup - 2009 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 7 (2/3):146-158.

View all 6 references / Add more references