Some critical remarks on the epistemology of functional magnetic resonance imaging

Science and Philosophy 8 (1):63-74 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article examines epistemological and ontological underpinnings of reasearch performed by means of magnetic resonance imaging and functional magnetic resonance imaging. It takes as its guiding line the important distinction between instruments and apparatuses drawn by Rom Harré. According to Harré, instruments such as barometers or thermometers do not cause the states they measure into existence. Apparatuses, in contradistinction, cause material states into existence to begin with, whereby theses states are subsequently processed according to suitable methods. Thus, when the objects of examination are subjected to 2 or more Tesla in fMRI, a strength of magnetic field never occuring in earthly nature, technical means literally create the states to be examined. Close examination of the functioning of MRI and fMRI indicates that brain states, e.g., are not simply read, or perceived as degrees of temperature are read on scale. Hence, one does not see any mental funtion when looking at fMRI outputs, for the visible output has been semantically processed on the basis of invisible quantum mechanical processes that have undergone translations into digital data caused by the fMRI device itself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri) in the classroom.Allyson C. Rosen - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):30 – 31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-18

Downloads
21 (#692,524)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations