“Hello, hello—it's English I speak!”: a qualitative exploration of patients' understanding of the science of clinical trials

Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):664-669 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informed consent may be seriously compromised if patients fail to understand the experimental nature of the trial in which they are participating. Using focus groups, the authors explored how prospective trial participants interpret and understand the science of clinical trials by using patient information sheets relative to their medical condition. An opportunity was provided to hear in the patients’ own words how they interpret the information and why there is variable understanding. Respondents struggled to comprehend the meaning and purpose of concepts such as randomisation and double blinding, and found them threatening to their ideas of medical care. Suggestions are made about how to improve the national guidelines on written information for trial participants and pretesting of the information sheets is advocated

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The protection of patients' rights in clinical trials.Marek Czarkowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
Uncertainty and the ethics of clinical trials.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):149-167.
Statistical decisions and the interim analyses of clinical trials.Roger Stanev - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (1):61-74.
The Research Misconception.Maurie Markman - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):241-252.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
27 (#572,408)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?