The Structure and Dynamics Argument against Materialism Revisited

Problemos 98 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alter elaborates and defends an ambitious argument advanced by Chalmers against physicalism. As Alter notes, the argument is valid. But I will argue that not all its premises are true. In particular, it is false that all physical truths are purely structural. In denying this, I focus not on the objects of pure physical theory but on the homely, macroscopic objects of our daily lives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Gaps and the Mind-Body Problem.Thomas Foerster - 2019 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Introspection and Materialism.Mstislav Kazakov - 2017 - Filosofiâ I Kosmologiâ 18:138-152.
Turning the zombie on its head.Amir Horowitz - 2009 - Synthese 170 (1):191 - 210.
The modal argument improved.Brian Cutter - 2020 - Analysis 80 (4):629-639.
The overdetermination argument revisited.Agustín Vicente - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (3):331-47.
Can the physicalist explain colour structure in terms of colour experience?1.Adam Pautz - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):535 – 564.
The Two-Dimensional Argument Against Materialism.David Chalmers - 2009 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Sven Walter (eds.), Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-24

Downloads
48 (#315,498)

6 months
9 (#242,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrei Mărăşoiu
University of Bucharest

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references