A false dichotomy. Commentary on 'Clinical guidelines: ways ahead' (C. W. R. Onion and T. Walley, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4, 287–293, this issue) [Book Review]

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):295-298 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

SummaryThe dichotomy between ‘scientific’ and ‘practical’ approaches to guideline development is false and divisive. Instead we should concentrate on developing mechanisms to develop and implement valid guidelines to improve patient care. The development of valid guidelines requires considerable expertise and is time consuming and expensive. It is most efficiently done at a regional or national level. The implementation of valid guidelines requires local action including the identification and modification of valid guidelines and a coordinated evidence-based implementation strategy (Grimshaw & Eccles 1998).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Clinical guidelines: ways ahead.C. W. R. Onion Md Mrcgp & T. Walley Md Frcp - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):287-293.
Clinical guidelines and the law: advice, guidance or regulation?Brian Hurwitz - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (1):49-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Developing clinically valid practice guidelines.Jeremy Grimshaw, Martin Eccles & Ian Russell - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (1):37-48.
Clinical guidelines: ways ahead.C. W. R. Onion Md Mrcgp & T. Walley Md Frcp - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):287-293.

Add more references