Reply to Howard, De Nys, and Speight

The Owl of Minerva 43 (1/2):149-177 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this response I first address the criticisms of omission by discussing some of the elements of the original project that were excluded in the final version (section 1). In section 2 I respond to Howard’s criticism that I assume too much transparency in conscience. In section 3 I discuss the problem of evil and the transition in the Phenomenology of Spirit from conscience to religion. I focus here especially on the distinction between Objective and Absolute Spirit, and on how that distinction plays out differently in the Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Right. In section 4 I take up the specifically political issues of conscience, responding to Speight’s suggestion that conscience should have a transformative role and to De Nys’s query about the State’s relationship to dissenting moral and religious views. Finally, in section 5 I take up the issues of whether I and Hegel do justice to the range of uses of conscience and whether or not the Hegelian view is too optimistic about modernity.


Added to PP

308 (#8,522)

6 months
104 (#164,936)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dean Moyar
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral Luck.Bernard Williams - 1981 - Critica 17 (51):101-105.
Recognition: Fichte and Hegel on the Other.Robert R. Williams - 1992 - State University of New York Press.
Hegel's Philosophy of Freedom.Paul Franco - 1999 - Yale University Press.
Hegel’s Philosophy of Freedom.Paul Franco - 1999 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (4):765-767.
Philosophie des Rechts: Die Vorlesung von 1819/20 in einer Nachschrift.G. W. F. Hegel - 1983 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 89 (1):126-127.

View all 7 references / Add more references