Expanding Newborn Screening: Process, Policy, and Priorities

Hastings Center Report 38 (3):32-39 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the 1960s, newborn screening programs tested for a single very rare but serious disorder. In recent years, thanks to the development of new screening technology, they have expanded into panels of tests; a federally sponsored expert group has recommended that states test for twenty-nine core disorders and twenty-five secondary disorders. By the standards used to decide whether to introduce new preventive health services into clinical use, the decision-making in newborn screening policy has been lax.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Krabbe Newborn Screening.R. H. Dees & J. M. Kwon - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (1):114-128.
Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening?Lainie Friedman Ross - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):299-328.
Toward a Realistic Assessment of PKU Screening.Diane B. Paul - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:322 - 328.
Newborn screening: new developments, new dilemmas.N. J. Kerruish - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):393-398.
Parental consent for newborn screening in southern Taiwan.M.-C. Huang - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):621-624.
Should Parental Refusals of Newborn Screening Be Respected?Newson Ainsley - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (2):135-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#459,370)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references