Governing the Anthropocene: Agency, governance, knowledge

European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):9-38 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The growing body of literature on the idea of the Anthropocene has opened up serious questions that go to the heart of the social and human sciences. There has been as yet no satisfactory theoretical framework for the analysis of the Anthropocene debate in the social and human sciences. The notion of the Anthropocene is not only a condition in which humans have become geologic agents, thus signalling a temporal shift in Earth history: it can be seen as a new object of knowledge and an order of governance. A promising direction for theorizing in the social and human science is to approach the notion of the Anthropocene as exemplified in new knowledge practices that have implications for governance. It invokes new conceptions of time, agency, knowledge and governance. The Anthropocene has become a way in which the human world is re-imagined culturally and politically in terms of its relation with the Earth. It entails a cultural model, that is an interpretative category by which contemporary societies make sense of the world as embedded in the Earth, and articulate a new kind of historical self-understanding, by which an alternative order of governance is projected. This points in the direction of cosmopolitics – and thus of a ‘Cosmopolocene’ – rather than a geologization of the social or in the post-humanist philosophy, the end of the human condition as one marked by agency.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Labor as Action: the Human Condition in the Anthropocene.Ari-Elmeri Hyvönen - 2020 - Research in Phenomenology 50 (2):240-260.
The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate.Daniel Chernilo - 2017 - European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):44-60.
The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives.Zoltán Boldizsár Simon - 2020 - European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2):184-199.
Saving Earth: encountering Heidegger's philosophy of technology in the anthropocene.Jochem Zwier & Vincent Blok - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):222-242.
Religion in the Age of the Anthropocene.Arianne Françoise Conty - 2021 - Environmental Values 30 (2):215-234.
How to Differentiate a Macintosh from a Mongoose.Arianne Conty - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):295-318.
The Politics of the Anthropocene.John S. Dryzek & Jonathan Pickering - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Anthropocene monument: On relating geological and human time.Bronislaw Szerszynski - 2017 - European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):111-131.
Questioning the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Is the Anthropocene Anthropocentric?Rangga Kala Mahaswa - 2020 - SHS Web Conf. Volume 76, 2020 The 1st International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (ICSH 2019).

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
25 (#614,662)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The human condition [selections].Hannah Arendt - 2013 - In Timothy C. Campbell & Adam Sitze (eds.), Biopolitics: A Reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
Being human: the problem of agency.Margaret Scotford Archer - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references