Reduction, Unity and the Nature of Science: Kant's Legacy?

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 63:37-62 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the hallmarks of Kantian philosophy, especially in connection with its characterization of scientific knowledge, is the importance of unity, a theme that is also the driving force behind a good deal of contemporary high energy physics. There are a variety of ways that unity figures in modern science—there is unity of method where the same kinds of mathematical techniques are used in different sciences, like physics and biology; the search for unified theories like the unification of electromagnetism and optics by Maxwell; and, more recently, the project of grand unification or the quest for a theory of everything which involves a reduction of the four fundamental forces under the umbrella of a single theory. In this latter case it is thought that when energies are high enough, the forces, while very different in strength, range and the types of particles on which they act, become one and the same force. The fact that these interactions are known to have many underlying mathematical features in common suggests that they can all be described by a unified field theory. Such a theory describes elementary particles in terms of force fields which further unifies all the interactions by treating particles and interactions in a technically and conceptually similar way. It is this theoretical framework that allows for the prediction that measurements made at a certain energy level will supposedly indicate that there is only one type of force. In other words, not only is there an ontological reduction of the forces themselves but the mathematical framework used to describe the fields associated with these forces facilitates their description in a unified theory. Specific types of symmetries serve an important function in establishing these kinds of unity, not only in the construction of quantum field theories but also in the classification of particles; classifications that can lead to new predictions and new ways of understanding properties like quantum numbers. Hence, in order to address issues about unification and reduction in contemporary physics we must also address the way that symmetries facilitate these processes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reduction, unity and the nature of science: Kant's legacy?Margaret Morrison - 2008 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 63:37-62.
Unified Theories and Disparate Things.Margaret Morrison - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:365 - 373.
Conceptualizing the (dis)unity of science.Todd A. Grantham - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (2):133-155.
Gauge gravity and the unification of natural forces.Chuang Liu - 2001 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):143 – 159.
The Concept of Reduction.Raphael van Riel - 2014 - Heidelberg: Springer.
Anforderungen an eine physikalische Fundamentaltheorie.Hedrich Reiner - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):23-60.
Quantum Mechanics and the Program for the Unity of Science.David Carl Scharf - 1985 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
27 (#506,730)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Margaret Morrison
Last affiliation: University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Kant, race, and natural history.Stella Sandford - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 44 (9):950-977.
Poincaré’s aesthetics of science.Milena Ivanova - 2017 - Synthese 194 (7):2581-2594.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Opus Postumum.Jeffrey Edwards, Immanuel Kant, Eckart Forster & Michael Rosen - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (2):280.

Add more references