Response to Open Peer Commentaries: When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?
American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):W3-W4 (2019)
Abstract
Volume 19, Issue 5, May 2019, Page W3-W4.DOI
10.1080/15265161.2019.1591543
My notes
Similar books and articles
When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?Stephanie R. Morain, Steven Joffe & Emily A. Largent - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):11-18.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Decisional Analysis of Consent”.Jonathan Baron - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):W51-W53.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Placebo Effects and Informed Consent”.Mark Alfano - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10):1-3.
Trustworthiness in Untrustworthy Times: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Beyond Consent.Stephanie A. Kraft, Mildred K. Cho, Katherine Gillespie, Nina Varsava, Kelly E. Ormond, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (5):W6-W8.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Why Consent May Not Be Needed For Organ Procurement”.James Delaney & David B. Hershenov - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):1-2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Informed Consent Revisited: Japan and the US”.Akira Akabayashi & Brian Taylor Slingsby - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):W27-W28.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Defining the Scope of Implied Consent in the Emergency Department".Mark Graber & Raul Easton - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):3-4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Addressing Consent Issues in Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death”.Kim J. Overby, Michael S. Weinstein & Autumn Fiester - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):3-5.
Nudging in Context: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Nudging and Informed Consent”.Shlomo Cohen - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):W1 - W6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries for “Ethical Challenges Within Veterans Administration Healthcare Facilities: Perspectives of Managers, Clinicians, Patients, and Ethics Committee Chairpersons”.Mary Beth Foglia, Robert A. Pearlman, Melissa Bottrell, Jane K. Altemose & Ellen Fox - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (4):3-4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Ethical 'Elephant' in the Death Penalty 'Room”'.Michael Keane - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):5-6.
A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Patient and Citizen Participation in Health: The Need for Improved Ethical Support”.Laura Williamson - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (12):W1 - W5.
Consent to open label extension studies: some ethical issues.P. Wainwright - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):373-376.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Community Members as Recruiters of Human Subjects: Ethical Considerations”.Christian Simon & Maghboeba Mosavel - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):1-3.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-09
Downloads
11 (#845,819)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
2019-05-09
Downloads
11 (#845,819)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Getting into Their Heads: When the Investigator is also the Treating Physician.Stephanie R. Morain, Emily A. Largent & Anna Wexler - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (1):68-70.
Researchers Experience Moral Distress Too!Cynthia M. A. Geppert & Toby Schonfeld - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4):100-101.
