Perspective: "Of Uncertain Viability": The New Federal Rules for Fetal and Neonatal Research

Hastings Center Report 32 (5):47 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3528715

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Fetal Pain, Abortion, Viability, and the Constitution.I. Glenn Cohen & Sadath Sayeed - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):235-242.
Letting babies die.M. Brazier & D. Archard - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (3):125-126.
Tychastic Viability: A Mathematical Approach to Time and Uncertainty.Jean-Pierre Aubin - 2013 - Acta Biotheoretica 61 (3):329-340.
Epistemology, research methodology and rule 702 of the federal rules of evidence versus eva®.Stanley Paulo - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):327 - 341.
Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva.Charles Camosy - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):296-298.
Federal Regulations for Fetal Research: A Case for Reform.John C. Fletcher & Kenneth J. Ryan - 1987 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 15 (3):126-138.
Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology.Jonathan Muraskas, Patricia A. Marshall, Paul Tomich, Thomas F. Myers, John G. Gianopoulos & David C. Thomasma - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):160-170.
A Scottish researcher's response.H. McHaffie - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):406-407.
A Philosophical Critique of the "Best Interests" Criterion and an Exploration of Clinical Ethical Strategies for Balancing the Interests of Infants or Fetuses, Family Members, and Society in the United States, India, and Sweden.Catherine Myser - 1994 - Dissertation, Georgetown University
Bill to Resume Federal Funding of Fetal Tissue Transplantation Is Damaging to Women.Dorothy E. Vawter, Karen G. Gervais & Warren Kearney - 1991 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 13 (5):11.
The Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research Issue: Implications for Science Policy.Elsa Elizabeth Macias - 1995 - Dissertation, Arizona State University
Using malpractice claims to identify risk factors for neurological impairment among infants following non‐reassuring fetal heart rate patterns during labour.Aaron S. Kesselheim, Martin T. November, Karen L. Lifford, Thomas F. McElrath, Ann L. Puopolo, E. John Orav & David M. Studdert - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):476-483.
A government of laws and not men: Prohibiting non-precedential opinions by statute or procedural rule.Amy E. Sloan - unknown
Legal Regulation of the Use of Race in Medical Research.Erik Lillquist & Charles A. Sullivan - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):535-551.
Attitudes of women to fetal tissue research.F. Anderson, A. Glasier, J. Ross & D. T. Baird - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):36-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
22 (#688,104)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The natural history of vulnerability.Jonathan D. Moreno - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):52 – 53.
Ethical decision-making regarding infant viability.Janet Kelly & Emma Welch - forthcoming - Nursing Ethics:096973301667786.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references