On second order norms. An interpretation of €˜'ought implies can' and 'is commanded implies is permitted'

Ratio (Misc.) 10:101-115 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Kant Hold that Ought Implies Can?Shyam Ranganathan - 2010 - In J. Sharma & A. Raguramaraju (eds.), Grounding Morality. Routledge. pp. 60-87.
Consequentialism and the "Ought Implies Can" Principle.Elinor Mason - 2003 - American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (4):319-331.
Understanding Norms Without a Theory of Mind.Kristin Andrews - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (5):433-448.
A Simple Proof that Super-Consistency Implies Cut Elimination.Gilles Dowek & Olivier Hermant - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (4):439-456.
Internal reasons and the ought-implies-can principle.Jonny Anomaly - 2008 - Philosophical Forum 39 (4):469-483.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

I Ought, Therefore I Can.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (2):167-216.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references