Mind the gap: Misdirection, inattentional blindness and the relationship between overt and covert attention

Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1105-1106 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The present commentary addresses two issues arising from Memmert’s paper. First, can the ‘misdirection’ and ‘inattentional blindness’ paradigms provide important insights into the relationship between ‘overt’ and ‘covert’ attentional processes? Second, what are the most fruitful directions for research that seeks to combine these attentional paradigms in ecologically valid settings? We argue that although Memmert’s paper postulates several important differences between the misdirection and inattentional blindness paradigms, it may not emphasise sufficiently strongly the significant insights into attention that have been yielded by the former approach. To illustrate, we discuss the utility of the misdirection paradigm in providing an ecologically valid method to investigate the relationship between overt and covert attentional processes. Such naturalistic methods are required to ensure optimal integration of the misdirection and inattentional blindness paradigms within a general theory of attention



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What’s “inattentional” about inattentional blindness?Steven B. Most - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1102-1104.


Added to PP

64 (#258,947)

6 months
11 (#272,549)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?