Hastings Center Report 46 (3):33-43 (2016)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This article takes the following two assumptions for granted: first, that gifts influence physicians and, second, that the influences gifts have on physicians may be harmful for patients. These assumptions are common in the applied ethics literature, and they prompt an obvious practical question, namely, what is the best way to mitigate the negative effects? We examine the negative effects of gift giving in depth, considering how the influence occurs, and we assert that the ethical debate surrounding gift-giving practices must be reoriented. Our main claim is that the failure of recent policies addressing gift giving can be traced to a misunderstanding of what psychological mechanisms are most likely to underpin physicians’ biased behavior as a result of interaction with the medical industry. The problem with gift giving is largely not a matter of malicious or consciously self-interested behavior, but of well-intentioned actions on the part of physicians that are nonetheless perniciously infected by the presence of the medical industry. Substantiating this claim will involve elaboration on two points. First, we will retrace the history of policies regarding gift giving between the medical profession and the medical industry and highlight how most policies assume a rationalistic view of moral agency. Reliance on this view of agency is best illustrated by past attempts to address gift giving in terms of conflicts of interest. Second, we will introduce and motivate an alternate view of moral agency emerging from recent literature in social psychology on implicit social cognition. We will show that proper consideration of implicit social cognition paints a picture of human psychology at odds with the rationalistic model assumed in discussions of COIs. With these two pieces on the table we will be able to show that, without fully appreciating the social-psychological mechanisms of implicit cognition, policy-makers are likely to overlook significant aspects of how gifts influence doctors
|
Keywords | biomedical ethics implicit cognition policy recommendations gift giving medical practice |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1002/hast.588 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Review of Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion.Dale E. Miller - unknown
Implicit Bias, Character and Control.Jules Holroyd & Dan Kelly - 2016 - In Jonathan Webber & Alberto Masala (eds.), From Personality to Virtue. New York, NY, USA: pp. 106-133.
The Moral Behaviour of Ethicists: Peer Opinion.Eric Schwitzgebel & J. Rust - 2009 - Mind 118 (472):1043-1059.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Toward an Ecological Bioethics.Nicolae Morar & Joshua August Skorburg - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (5):35-37.
Bioethical Ideals, Actual Practice, and the Double Life of Norms.Daniel Kelly & Nicolae Morar - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (4):86-88.
Similar books and articles
All Gifts Large and Small: Toward an Understanding of the Ethics of Pharmaceutical Industry Gift-Giving.Jon F. Merz, Arthur L. Caplan & Dana Katz - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (10):11-17.
Pharmaceutical “Gift-Giving,” Medical Education, and Conflict of Interest.Dale Murray & Heather Certain - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):335-343.
Varieties of Social Cognition.Eric Luis Uhlmann, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom - 2008 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (3):293-322.
Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction.Reinout W. Wiers & Alan W. Stacy (eds.) - 2006 - Sage Publications.
Unconscious Conflict of Interest: A Jewish Perspective.A. Gold & P. S. Appelbaum - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):402-405.
Gift-Giving in the Medical Student–Patient Relationship.Yassar Abdullah S. Alamri - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):506-507.
Racial Cognition and the Ethics of Implicit Bias.Daniel Kelly & Erica Roedder - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (3):522–540.
Is the Implicit Association Test a Valid and Valuable Measure of Implicit Consumer Social Cognition?Brian C. Tietje - unknown
Implicit Impressions.James S. Uleman, Steven L. Blader & Alexander Todorov - 2005 - In Ran R. Hassin, James S. Uleman & John A. Bargh (eds.), The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. pp. 362-392.
Implicit Cognition and the Social Unconscious.Robert S. Steele & Jill G. Morawski - 2002 - Theory and Psychology 12 (1):37-54.
Changing Implicit Cognition: Findings From Experimental Psychopathology.P. De Jong, M. Kindt & A. Roefs - 2006 - In Reinout W. Wiers & Alan W. Stacy (eds.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction. Sage Publications.
A Unified Theory of Implicit Attitudes, Stereotypes, Self-Esteem, and Self-Concept.Anthony Greenwald - manuscript
Early Social Cognition: Alternatives to Implicit Mindreading.Leon Bruin, Derek Strijbos & Marc Slors - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):499-517.
Early Social Cognition: Alternatives to Implicit Mindreading.Leon de Bruin, Derek Strijbos & Marc Slors - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):499-517.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-09-19
Total views
151 ( #77,325 of 2,505,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,153 )
2015-09-19
Total views
151 ( #77,325 of 2,505,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,153 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads