- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Great expectations
In Tim Lewens (ed.), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge (2007)
Abstract
I distinguish between risks in which most people will do badly from those in which few will, though some will do very badly.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Great expectations: An intensive self analysis. [REVIEW]Jerold A. Edmondson & Frans Plank - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (3):373 - 413.
The Ancillary-Care Responsibilities of Researchers: Reasonable But Not Great Expectations.Roger Brownsword - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (4):679-691.
Great expectations—German debates about artificial insemination in humans around 1912.Christina Benninghaus - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):374-392.
Participation as a means of enhancing the legitimacy of decisions on technology? A sceptical analysis.Armin Grunwald - 2004 - Poiesis and Praxis 3 (s 1-2):106-122.
The leadership of principals and science heads in schools with a Christian philosophy: expectations and realities.Stuart J. Quarmby - unknown
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
179 (#106,167)
6 months
31 (#102,418)
2009-01-28
Downloads
179 (#106,167)
6 months
31 (#102,418)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
On the Spot Ethical Decision-Making in CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological or Nuclear Event) Response.Andrew P. Rebera & Chaim Rafalowski - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (3):735-752.
The Prospects for Objectivity in Risk Assessment.John Rossi - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (2):237-253.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo