God and the Argument from Consciousness: A Reply to Lim

European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 4 (1):243-251 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, Daniel Lim has published a thoughtful critique of one form of my argument for the existence of God from consciousness (hereafter, AC). After stating his presentation of the relevant contours of my argument, I shall present the main components of his critique, followed by my response. Since one purpose of my publications of AC has been to foster discussion about a neglected argument for God’s existence, I am thankful to Lim for his interesting article and the chance to further the discussion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Degrees of Separation in the Phaedo.Michael Pakaluk - 2003 - Phronesis 48 (2):89 - 115.
A Russellian Response to the Structural Argument Against Physicalism.Barbara Montero - 2010 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (3-4):70-83.
Dualism and the atoms of thought.Wolfram Hinzen - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (9):25-55.
The property dualism argument against physicalism.Andrew Botterell - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:223-242.
Oppy on the Argument from Consciousness: A Rejoinder.J. P. Moreland - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):213 - 226.
The knowledge argument.Torin Alter - 2007 - In Max Velmans & Susan Schneider (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Blackwell. pp. 396--405.
Terry, Terry, quite contrary.Sven Walter - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):103-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-19

Downloads
2 (#1,784,141)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references