Faith, Reason and History in Early Modern Catholic Biblical Interpretation : Fr. Richard Simon and St. Thomas More

New Blackfriars 96 (1066):658-673 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article contrasts St. Thomas More's theoretical work on the role of faith and history in biblical exegesis with that of Fr. Richard Simon. I argue that, although Simon's work appears to be a critique of his more skeptical contemporaries like Hobbes and Spinoza, in reality he is carrying their work forward. I argue that More's union of faith and reason, theology and history, is more promising than Simon's for Catholic theological biblical exegesis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Visits to the Sepulcher and Biblical Exegesis.Eleonore Stump - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (4):353-377.
Biblical interpretation.Thomas Williams - 2001 - In Eleonore Stump & Norman Kretzmann (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Augustine. Cambridge University Press. pp. 59--70.
Reflections on Biblical Theology.J. Christiaan Beker - 1970 - Interpretation 24 (3):303-320.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-06

Downloads
101 (#168,750)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references