Journal of Business Ethics:1-13 (forthcoming)

Abstract
Recent advances in machine learning methods have created opportunities to eliminate unfairness from algorithmic decision making. Multiple computational techniques have arisen out of this work. Yet, urgent questions remain about the perceived fairness of these criteria and in which situations organizations should use them. In this paper, we seek to gain insight into these questions by exploring fairness perceptions of five algorithmic criteria. We focus on two key dimensions of fairness evaluations: distributive fairness and procedural fairness. We shed light on variation in the potential for different algorithmic criteria to facilitate distributive fairness. Subsequently, we discuss procedural fairness and provide a framework for understanding how algorithmic criteria relate to essential aspects of this construct, which helps to identify when a specific criterion is suitable. From a practical standpoint, we encourage organizations to recognize that managing fairness in machine learning systems is complex, and that adopting a blind or one-size-fits-all mentality toward algorithmic criteria will surely damage people’s attitudes and trust in automated technology. Instead, firms should carefully consider the subtle yet significant differences between these technical solutions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-021-04939-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness.Pak-Hang Wong - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 33 (2):225-244.
Hedonism.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2016 - JOHN-MICHAEL KUCZYNSKI.
Does the End Justify the Means?Giuliano Pontara - 1967 - Stockholm, Filosofiska Institutionen Vid Stockholms Universitet.
The End Can Justify the Means--But Rarely.Warren G. Bovee - 1991 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (3):135 – 145.
Procedural Justice.Klaus F. Röhl (juriste) & Stefan Machura - 1997 - Dartmouth Publishing Company.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-18

Total views
10 ( #877,204 of 2,454,488 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #65,055 of 2,454,488 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes