Ethics, Policy and Environment 19 (3):335-349 (2016)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
One major question in climate justice is whether developed countries’ historical emissions are relevant to distributing the burdens of mitigating climate change. To argue that developed countries should bear a greater share of the burdens of mitigation because of their past emissions is to advocate ‘historical accountability.’ Standard arguments for historical accountability rely on corrective justice. These arguments face important objections. By using the notion of a global emissions budget, however, we can reframe the debate over historical accountability in terms of distributive justice. This paper argues that, given two defensible assumptions, distributive justice requires historical accountability. These assumptions are that the proper claimants on the emissions budgets are societies or states, not individuals, and that we should be allocating the entirety of the original, pre-industrial budget, rather than just the remainder.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1080/21550085.2016.1226240 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
View all 32 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fairness in Allocating the Global Emissions Budget.David R. Morrow - 2017 - Environmental Values 26 (6):669-691.
Climate Change and Political Philosophy: Who Owes What to Whom?Joerg Chet Tremmel - 2013 - Environmental Values 22 (6):725-749.
Distributive Justice and Climate Change. The Allocation of Emission Rights.Lukas Meyer & Dominic Roser - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (2):223-249.
Climate Justice and Historical Emissions.Lukas H. Meyer & Dominic Roser - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):229-253.
Compensation for Historical Emissions and Excusable Ignorance.Alexa Zellentin - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (3):258-274.
Radically Non-Ideal Climate Politics and the Obligation to at Least Vote Green.Aaron Maltais - 2013 - Environmental Values 22 (5):589-608.
Philosphical Obstacles to Shared Reponsibility for Climate Change.Anne Ozar - 2013 - Journal of Religion and Society:56-72.
Justice and the Distribution of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.Simon Caney - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2):125-146.
Climate Matters Pro Tanto, Does It Matter All-Things-Considered?Holly Lawford-Smith - 2016 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 40 (1):129-142.
Subsistence Versus Sustainable Emissions? Equity and Climate Change.Jay Odenbaugh - 2010 - Environmental Philosophy 7 (1):1-15.
Cashing in on Climate Change: Political Theory and Global Emissions Trading.Edward A. Page - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):259-279.
Bridging The Emissions Gap: A Plea For Taking Up The Slack.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2013 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 3 (1):273-301.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-09-03
Total views
28 ( #408,277 of 2,506,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,369 )
2016-09-03
Total views
28 ( #408,277 of 2,506,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads