Consensus, contracts, and committees

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):393-408 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following a brief account of the puzzle that ethics committees present for the Western Philosophical tradition, I will examine the possibility that social contract theory can contribute to a philosophical account of these committees. Passing through classical as well as contemporary theories, particularly Rawls' recent constructivist approach, I will argue that social contract theory places severe constraints on the authority that may legitimately be granted to ethics committees. This, I conclude, speaks more about the suitability of the theory to this level of analysis than about the ethics committee phenomenon itself. Keywords: ethics committees, moral consensus, social contract theory CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,053

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics by committee: The moral authority of consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.
Australian commissions and committees on issues in bioethics.Peter Singer - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):403-424.
Committees and commissions in the united kingdom.Alastair B. Campbell - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):385-401.
Ethics committees for "high tech" innovations in japan.Rihito Kimura - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):457-464.
Veatch's new foundation for medical ethics.John Kultgen - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (4):369-386.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-22

Downloads
51 (#409,343)

6 months
14 (#205,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references