A Critique of Nicholas Rescher’s Contribution to our Understanding of the Problematic Relation of Evolution and Intelligent Design

Journal of Critical Realism 13 (1):38-51 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Rescher is a key figure in ‘new American pragmatist philosophy’. His work shares many commonalities with critical realism and engaging with it is always a rewarding experience. In this paper I set out the key features of his work on evolution and intelligent design, Productive Evolution: On Reconciling Evolution with Intelligent Design, and then address the weaknesses in the argument. The central strength of the argument is its innovative approach to the meaning of intelligent design in its relation to evolution. I use an analysis of the text to then consider what this suggests in terms of the nuance of immanent critique as realist concept.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,408

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

14 (#835,473)

6 months
3 (#426,595)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
What is it Like to be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Philosophy 56 (216):267-268.

View all 25 references / Add more references