The Semiotic of Bishop Berkeley — A Prelude to Peirce?

Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 20 (3):325 - 342 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peirce described himself as a disciple of Berkeley, and described the truth of Berkeleyanism as consisting, in part, of “hinging” all philosophy (or "all coenoscopy") on the concept of sign. This article collects Berkeley’s chief semiotic contributions, and discusses how it may have influenced Peirce’s semiotic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peirce and semiotic foundationalism.Michael Forest - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):728 - 744.
Berkeley and Irish philosophy.David Berman - 2005 - New York: Thoemmes Continuum.
Proper names and persons: Peirce's semiotic consideration of proper names.Eric Thomas Weber - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 346-362.
Another Interpretation of Peirce's Semiotic.Joseph Ransdell - 1976 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (2):97 - 110.
Peirce's theory of signs.Albert Atkin - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Christianity—Sign Among Signs?Hermann Deuser & Dennis Beach - 1993 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 7 (4):286 - 297.
Bishop Berkeley.Joseph M. Hone - 1931 - New York,: Macmillan. Edited by Mario M. Rossi.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James A. Moore
University of Pittsburgh (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references