- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Roots of Russell's Paradox
Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 8 (1):46 (1988)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
On Russell's vulnerability to Russell's paradox.James Levine - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (4):207-231.
A neglected resolution of Russell’s paradox of propositions.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (2):328-344.
Zermelo and Russell's Paradox: Is There a Universal set?G. Landini - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (2):180-199.
Intuition and Russell´s Paradox.Margaret Cuonzo - 2001 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 5 (1-2):73–86.
Russell's way out of the paradox of propositions.André Fuhrmann - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):197-213.
The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 3: Toward the 'Principles of Mathematics' 1900-02.Gregory H. Moore (ed.) - 1994 - Routledge.
The principle of uniform solution (of the paradoxes of self-reference).Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2000 - Mind 109 (433):117-122.
A note on Cantor's theorem and Russell's paradox.J. N. Crossley - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):70 – 71.
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions.André Fuhrmann - 2001 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 5 (1-2):19–42.
The Roots of Modern Logic [review of I. Grattan-Guinness, The Search for Mathematical Roots, 1870-1940 ].Alasdair Urquhart - 2001 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 21 (1):91-94.
A Berry and A Russell Without Self-Reference.Keith Simmons - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (2):253-261.
Passion and Paradox [review of Jean Cocks, Passion and Paradox: Intellectuals Confront the National Question ].Louis Greenspan - 2002 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 22 (1):92-94.
Russell's paradox in consistent fragments of Frege's grundgesetze der arithmetik.Kai F. Wehmeier - 2004 - In Godehard Link (ed.), One Hundred Years of Russell’s Paradox. de Gruyter.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-07
Downloads
31 (#486,401)
6 months
5 (#526,961)
2015-02-07
Downloads
31 (#486,401)
6 months
5 (#526,961)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The mathematical development of set theory from Cantor to Cohen.Akihiro Kanamori - 1996 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):1-71.
When series go in indefinitum, ad infinitum and in infinitum concepts of infinity in Kant’s antinomy of pure reason.Silvia De Bianchi - 2015 - Synthese 192 (8):2395-2412.
Where Are You Going, Metaphysics, and How are You Getting There? - Grounding Theory as a Case Study.Gila Sher - 2019 - In Quo Vadis, Metaphysics? de Gruyter Studium. pp. 37-57.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-67rzb uwo