Thinking Must Be Computation of the Right Kind

The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 9:115-122 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue for a computational theory of thinking that does not eliminate the mind. In doing so, I will defend computationalism against the arguments of John Searle and James Fetzer, and briefly respond to other common criticisms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thinking Must Be Computation of the Right Kind.James H. Fetzer - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 9:115-122.
Is Globalization a Real Threat to Democracy?Andrzej Maciej Kaniowski - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:235-246.
Contemporary Politics and Orientalist Thinking in the Light of Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy.Anna Petronella Fredlund - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:93-97.
A computational foundation for the study of cognition.David Chalmers - 2011 - Journal of Cognitive Science 12 (4):323-357.
What is Happening with P4C?Matthew Lipman - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 3:21-26.
Response to “Hume and the Ethics of Taste”.James Mock - 2014 - Southwest Philosophy Review 30 (2):37-39.
Comment on James Rocha, “Forced to Listen to the Heart”.E. M. Dadlez - 2014 - Southwest Philosophy Review 30 (2):51-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James H. Moor
Dartmouth College

Citations of this work

The status and future of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references