Choice, Character, and Excuse*: MICHAEL S. MOORE

Social Philosophy and Policy 7 (2):29-58 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Freud justified his extensive theorizing about dreams by the observation that they were “the royal road” to something much more general: namely, our unconscious mental life. The current preoccupation with the theory of excuse in criminal law scholarship can be given a similar justification, for the excuses are the royal road to theories of responsibility generally. The thought is that if we understand why we excuse in certain situations but not others, we will have also gained a much more general insight into the nature of responsibility itself. Nowhere has this thought been more evident than in the century-old focus of criminal law theoreticians on the excuse of insanity, a focus that could not be justified by the importance of the excuse itself. In this paper I wish to isolate two theories of excuse, each of which instantiates its own distinctive theory of responsibility. One is what I shall call the choice theory of excuse, according to which one is excused for the doing of a wrongful action because and only because at the moment of such action's performance, one did not have sufficient capacity or opportunity to make the choice to do otherwise. Such a choice theory of excuse instantiates a more general theory of responsibility, according to which we are responsible for wrongs we freely choose to do, and not responsible for wrongs we lacked the freedom to avoid doing. The second I shall call the character theory of excuse, according to which one is excused for the doing of a wrongful action because and only because such action is not determined by those enduring attributes of ourselves we call our characters.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 80,057

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The characters of excuse.Tadros Victor - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (3):495-519.
Violating Strict Deontological Constraints: Excuse or Pardon?Rudolf Schuessler - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (4):587-601.
Excusing mistakes of law.Gideon Yaffe - 2009 - Philosophers' Imprint 9:1-22.
Responsibility and the Abuse Excuse.Michael Stocker - 1999 - Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (2):175.
The logic of excuses and the rationality of emotions.John Gardner - 2009 - Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (3):315-338.
II—Marcia Baron: Culpability, Excuse, and the ‘Ill Will’ Condition.Marcia Baron - 2014 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 88 (1):91-109.
Ignorance and Force: Two Excusing Conditions for False Beliefs.René van Woudenberg - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):373-386.
Responsibility - The Epistemic Condition.Philip Robichaud & Jan Willem Wieland (eds.) - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

161 (#86,460)

6 months
5 (#166,113)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.
Free agency.Gary Watson - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (April):205-20.
The view from nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (2):221-222.

View all 21 references / Add more references