A Cantorian argument against infinitesimals

Synthese 133 (3):305 - 330 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1887 Georg Cantor gave an influential but cryptic proof of theimpossibility of infinitesimals. I first give a reconstruction ofCantor's argument which relies mainly on traditional assumptions fromEuclidean geometry, together with elementary results of Cantor's ownset theory. I then apply the reconstructed argument to theinfinitesimals of Abraham Robinson's nonstandard analysis. Thisbrings out the importance for the argument of an assumption I call theChain Thesis. Doubts about the Chain Thesis are seen to render thereconstructed argument inconclusive as an attack on the infinitelysmall.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
72 (#223,965)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Infinitesimals as an issue of neo-Kantian philosophy of science.Thomas Mormann & Mikhail Katz - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (2):236-280.
To Continue With Continuity.Martin Cooke - 2005 - Metaphysica 6 (2):91-109.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Non-standard Analysis.Gert Heinz Müller - 2016 - Princeton University Press.
Completeness in the theory of types.Leon Henkin - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):81-91.
Computability and Logic.G. S. Boolos & R. C. Jeffrey - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (1):95-95.
Completeness in the Theory of Types.Leon Henkin - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (1):72-73.
[Omnibus Review].Robert Goldblatt - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1):225-227.

View all 8 references / Add more references