What is the Value of Geometric Models to Understand Matter?

palermo italy: review of Ontology (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article analyzes the value of geometric models to understand matter with the examples of the Platonic model for the primary four elements (fire, air, water, and earth) and the models of carbon atomic structures in the new science of crystallography. How the geometry of these models is built in order to discover the properties of matter is explained: movement and stability for the primary elements, and hardness, softness and elasticity for the carbon atoms. These geometric models appear to have a double quality: firstly, they exhibit visually the scientific properties of matter, and secondly they give us the possibility to visualize its whole nature. Geometrical models appear to be the expression of the mind in the understanding of physical matter.

Similar books and articles

A characterization theorem for geometric logic.Olivia Caramello - 2011 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (4):318-321.
Topological representation of geometric theories.Henrik Forssell - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (6):380-393.
What do Freyd’s Toposes Classify?Peter Johnstone - 2013 - Logica Universalis 7 (3):335-340.
Re-inflating the Conception of Scientific Representation.Chuang Liu - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):41-59.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-21

Downloads
307 (#62,804)

6 months
82 (#50,511)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francoise Monnoyeur
Centre Jean Pepin - CNRS - Paris (France)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science and method.Henri Poincaré - 1914 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Francis Maitland.
Models in physics.Mary B. Hesse - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (15):198-214.

Add more references