Revisiting the censure theory of punishment

Philosophia 37 (1):125-131 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a rejoinder to Thaddeus Metz’s article “Censure Theory Still Best Accounts for Punishment of the Guilty: Reply to Montague.” In his article, Metz attempts to answer objections to censure theory that I had raised previously. I argue in my rejoinder that Metz’s defense of censure theory remains seriously problematic despite what he says in his reply.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thomas Hobbes and the philosophy of punishment.Alan Norrie - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (2):299 - 320.
Realism and the Censure Theory of Punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2002 - In Patricia Smith & Paolo Comanducci (eds.), Legal Philosophy: General Aspects. Franz Steiner Verlag. pp. 117-29.
Censure theory and intuitions about punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):491-512.
State denunciation of crime.Christopher Bennett - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):288-304.
Complicity in Thought and Language: Toleration of Wrong.Judith Lee Kissell - 1999 - Journal of Medical Humanities 20 (1):49-60.
Misdirection on the free will problem.Richard Double - 1997 - American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (3):359-68.
A Retributive Argument Against Punishment.Greg Roebuck & David Wood - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
Kant's Theory of Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (2):206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#399,999)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations