La fiabilidad teórica del determinismo. Un examen desde la propuesta de Mariano Artigas

Scientia et Fides 4 (2):245-262 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The theoretical reliability of determinism. A review from the proposal of Mariano Artigas This article has two purposes. The first is to demonstrate that the theory of determinism, which claims to be based on the principles of experimental science, cannot be considered as an explanation compatible with such sciences. To do this, we use some ideas of Mariano Artigas on the explanatory power of scientific theories and their reliability from his book The Mind of the Universe. Through this process we seek to achieve the second objective: to show the importance of the work of Artigas to dissolve complex contemporary debates, such as the current discussion about the existence of human freedom.

Similar books and articles

Mariano Artigas: 1979–1987.José María Valderas - 2016 - Scientia et Fides 4 (2):57-75.
On Artigas and Analytic Philosophy.Sebastian De Haro - 2016 - Scientia et Fides 4 (2):215-243.
Conocimiento humano, fiabilidad y falibilismo.Mariano Artigas - 1992 - Anuario Filosófico 25 (2):277-294.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-06

Downloads
240 (#79,798)

6 months
70 (#59,304)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Montoya
Universidad de Navarra

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.
The Illusion of Conscious Will.Daniel M. Wegner - 2002 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 2003 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free Will. Oxford University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references