Lisa Bufano and Aimee Mullins: disability and the aesthetic of non-human-like prostheses

Debates in Aesthetics 17 (2):15-36 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essay aims to examine possible readings of disability in the context of visual art, especially regarding bodies prosthetised in unexpected ways. To do that, I will analyse two performances, participated/created by Lisa Bu- fano and Aimee Mullins, which employ prosthetics that distance them from the mimicry of human limbs. I will briefly contextualize them in the history of prosthetics. I will observe how their peculiarity and non-human forms can serve aesthetic and destabilizing purposes regarding the contours of disability. I will especially mention their potentiality regarding disabled bodies’ mobility in space and their relationship with tools. The association between a disabled body and non-human traits carries several symbolic meanings and might also produce risks. Generally, they can update the perspectives on the crafting of creative assemblages that start from impaired bodies. In conclusion, I will observe how Bufano’s art entails more promises on an ethico-political level.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

James Gillingham, Aimee Mullins, and Matthew Barney1.Marquard Smith - 2006 - In Lennard J. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader. Psychology Press. pp. 309.
On Replacement Body Parts.Mary Jean Walker - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (1):61-73.
Rehabilitating human nature.Chrisoula Andreou - 2009 - Bioethics 24 (9):461-469.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-24

Downloads
382 (#49,821)

6 months
240 (#9,320)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations