Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):612-620 (2008)
AbstractAbstract: In this brief article, I claim that the Contribution Principle invoked by Christian Barry as a key principle for determining who owes what to the global destitute is mistaken as a definitive principle and unjustified as a provisional principle for dealing with global poverty. This principle assumes that merely causing, or contributing to the cause of, a state of affairs may be sufficient to have a special responsibility to bear the costs that this state of affairs entails. I argue that an agent will only have such a special responsibility if he or she has caused a state of affairs (for example, acute destitution) by violating a duty not to do so. Therefore, the Contribution Principle is mistaken. Finally, I tackle two possible responses to my argument. The first claims that states have a duty not to undertake actions that may cause, or contribute to the cause of, acute deprivations. The second claims that although the Contribution Principle may be mistaken as a definitive principle for dealing with global destitution, it is nonetheless correct as a provisional principle.
Similar books and articles
602 and One Dead: On Contribution to Global Poverty and Liability to Defensive Force.Gerhard Øverland - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):279-299.
Global systemic problems and interconnected duties.Leslie Pickering Francis - 2003 - Environmental Ethics 25 (2):115-128.
How not to criticize the precautionary principle.Jonathan Hughes - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.
The duty to eradicate global poverty: Positive or negative?Pablo Gilabert - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):537-550.
Self-ownership and the state: A democratic critique.Lea Ypi - 2011 - Ratio 24 (1):91-106.
A closer look at the 'new' principle.Michael Strevens - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):545-561.
The difference principle, equality of opportunity, and cosmopolitan justice.Gillian Brock - 2005 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):333-351.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties.Thomas Pogge - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):55-83.
On the very idea of cosmopolitan justice: Constructivism and international agency.Saladin Meckled-Garcia - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (3):245-271.
Equality, Luck, and Responsibility.Arthur Ripstein - 1994 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1):3-23.