Analogies are powerful and dangerous things

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):350-351 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The analogy between biological and cultural evolution is not perfect. Yet, as Mesoudi et al. show, many of the vaunted differences between cultural and genetic evolution (for example, an absence of discrete particles of cultural inheritance, and the blurred distinction between cultural replicators and cultural phenotypes) are, on closer inspection, either illusory or peripheral to the validity of the analogy. But what about horizontal transmission? We strongly agree with the authors that the potential for horizontal transmission of cultural traits does not invalidate an evolutionary approach to culture. We suggest, however, that it does require a different evolutionary treatment. (Published Online November 9 2006).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

3. On the Fate of Nations.Siobhan Nash-Marshall - 2001 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 4 (2).
Multiple analogies in archaeology.Cameron Shelley - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):579-605.
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things.James A. Hampton - 1989 - Mind and Language 4 (1-2):130-137.
Dangerous Supplement/Dangerous Memory.Walter Lowe - 1986 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 61 (1):34-55.
Hacia una lógica de analogía.John R. Welch - 1994 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 20 (1):161-167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#316,781)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references