Dan Moller
University of Maryland, College Park
This article discusses the aesthetic concept of boringness, of which there has been relatively little philosophical discussion, especially along its objective, nonpsychological dimensions. I begin by confronting skepticism about the validity of judgments about boringness and rebut suggestions to the effect that these judgments are inevitably compromised by mistakes or vices of the audience. The article then develops an account focused on certain kinds of reasonable expectations we form in a given aesthetic context. I go on to confront the question of whether boringness is inevitable given the internal imperatives of works of art and illustrate the discussion with Richard Wagner's Ring cycle. Although I focus on art, I conclude by drawing some connections with the boring in everyday life
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jaac.12074
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Really Boring Art.Andreas Elpidorou & John Gibson - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
Boredom in Art.Andreas Elpidorou - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Replies to Contesi, Hardcastle, Pismenny, and Gallegos.Andreas Elpidorou - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 3 (2):44-77.
From Trust to Body. Artspace, Prestige, Sensitivity.Filippo Fimiani - 2017 - In Felice Masi & Maria Catena (eds.), The Changing Faces of Space. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 277-288.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Boring Art Just Boring?Derek Matravers - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (4):425-426.
Boring Beauty and Universal Morality: Kant on the Ideal of Beauty.Rachel Zuckert - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):107 – 130.
Boring Infinite Descent.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2014 - Metaphilosophy 45 (2):257-269.
Why has Bioethics Become so Boring?Albert R. Jonsen - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):689 – 699.
Kant, Adorno and the Work of Art.Murray W. Skees - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):915-933.
Why Isn't Minimal Art Boring?Richard Lind - 1986 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (2):195-197.
Against the Sociology of Art.Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):206-218.
Interesting, Boring, Beautiful.William James Earle - 2012 - Philosophical Forum 43 (4):361-382.
ESP: A Scientific Evaluation.Antony Flew, C. E. M. Hansel & E. C. Boring - 1968 - Philosophical Quarterly 18 (71):183.


Added to PP index

Total views
84 ( #138,564 of 2,507,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,140 of 2,507,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes