Evangelical Catholicism and the Tacit Dimension of Theology

Tradition and Discovery 28 (1):31-32 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moleski responds to reviews of Personal Catholicism by Joseph Kroger and John Apcyznski. He argues that theology is tacit or rooted in tacit knowledge and therefore cannot be fully articulated. He portrays the Roman Catholic tradition as an interpretative framework that differs from scientific frameworks by being bound to a particular revelation made in history which is then preserved by a Specific Authority.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How “Catholic” Is Personal Catholicism?John V. Apczynski - 2001 - Tradition and Discovery 28 (1):28-30.
On the Tradition of Intellectuals.Edward Shils - 1995 - Tradition and Discovery 22 (2):10-26.
Analysing Tacit Knowledge.Harry Collins - 2011 - Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):38-42.
Tacit Knowledge in Organizations.Jere Moorman - 2002 - Tradition and Discovery 29 (2):55-55.
Response to Martin X. Moleski and John V. Apczynski.Philip Rolnick - 1995 - Tradition and Discovery 22 (1):36-37.
Tacit Knowledge and the Diplicate Order.David Bohm - 1984 - Tradition and Discovery 12 (1):25-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
45 (#516,855)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references