Could you think carruthers’ ideas without having to speak them? Talk with yourself if you want to have any thought on that
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):692-693 (2002)
AbstractFirst, the importance of language in cognition is recognized. Nevertheless, this does not necessarily imply that the locus of thought is natural language (words, syntax, phonology). Then, difficulties with some of Carruthers’ hypotheses are stated: Is an account based on LFs capable of dealing with the complexities involved in what we call thought? Finally, mention of the issue of language production is made.
Similar books and articles
Internalizing communication.Gerard O'Brien & Jon Opie - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):694-695.
Thought, language, and the argument from explicitness.Agustín Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (3):381–401.
No conceptual thought without language.Christopher Gauker - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):687-687.
What domain integration could not be.Philip Robbins - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):696-697.
Semantic underdetermination and the cognitive uses of language.Agustin Vicente & Fernando Martinez-Manrique - 2005 - Mind and Language 20 (5):537–558.
Précis of the architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought.Peter Carruthers - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (3):257–262.
Language, Thought and Consciousness: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology.Peter Carruthers - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads