Autonomy, free speech and automatic behaviour

Res Publica 13 (1):53-75 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


One of the strongest defences of free speech holds that autonomy requires the protection of speech. In this paper I examine five conditions that autonomy must satisfy. I survey recent research in social psychology regarding automatic behaviour, and a challenge to autonomy is articulated. I argue that a plausible strategy for neutralising some of the autonomy-threatening automatic responses consists in avoiding the exposure to the environmental features that trigger them. If this is so, we can good autonomy-based pro tanto reasons for controlling exposure to certain forms of speech.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 80,143

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

84 (#155,597)

6 months
6 (#144,548)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andres Moles
Central European University

References found in this work

Autonomy and preference formation.Richard Arneson - 1994 - In Joel Feinberg, Jules L. Coleman & Allen E. Buchanan (eds.), In Harm's Way: Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg. Cambridge University Press. pp. 42--75.

Add more references