Interpretation: SEG 3 (3):ST43-ST53 (2015)

Contrary to the assumption in cubic law, the surface of fractures has some degree of roughness, which impacts their fluid dynamics. Incorporating the effect of roughness can improve the simulation of fluid flow in fractures and faults, as well as proppant transport in hydraulic fracturing. To investigate the effect of roughness on the fluid flow, we created a fracture using the Brazilian test, and its roughness was measured using a laser profilometer. Experimental permeability measurements showed a reduction in permeability as the effective stress increased. However, the unmatching surfaces of the fracture prevented its complete mechanical closure. Numerical simulations of the fluid dynamics were conducted on the measured fracture geometry. We determined that the hydraulic fracture aperture is less than the mechanical fracture aperture and that there was anisotropy in the fracture permeability. The ratio of hydraulic fracture aperture to mechanical fracture aperture, as well as anisotropy in fracture permeability, increased when the fracture aperture decreased. The anisotropy in fracture permeability was 45% at the lowest simulated fracture aperture. Integrating the experimental and numerical data, we estimated the fracture porosity and fracture permeability.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1190/int-2014-0230.1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,768
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anisotropy and Interaction of Fields of Spatial Induction.Richard M. Michaels - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (4):235.
Rethinking Intrinsic Value.Shelly Kagan - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (4):277-297.
Intrinsic Vs. Extrinsic Value.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What’s the Use of an Intrinsic Property?Carrie Figdor - 2014 - In Robert M. Francescotti (ed.), Companion to Intrinsic Properties. De Gruyter. pp. 139-156.
Intrinsic Value and Investment.Ken O'Day - 1999 - Utilitas 11 (2):194.
Intrinsic Value and the Argument From Regress.Julia Tanner - 2007 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 12 (2):313-322..
Hyperventilating About Intrinsic Value.F. Feldman - 2005 - In Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen & Michael J. Zimmerman (eds.), The Journal of Ethics. Springer. pp. 45--58.
Hyperventilating About Intrinsic Value.Fred Feldman - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (4):339-354.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,114,237 of 2,462,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes