Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2):452-477 (2019)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This paper tries to explain why racial profiling involves a serious injustice and to do so in a way that avoids the problems of existing philosophical accounts. An initially plausible view maintains that racial profiling is pro tanto wrong in and of itself by violating a constraint on fair treatment that is generally violated by acts of statistical discrimination based on ascribed characteristics. However, consideration of other cases involving statistical discrimination suggests that violating a constraint of this kind may not be an especially serious wrong in and of itself. To fully capture the significant wrong that occurs when racial profiling is targeted at black Americans or other similarly situated groups, it is argued that we should appeal to the idea that this basic injustice is exacerbated when it forms part of a larger pattern of similar actions that collectively realize a state of cumulative injustice.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/phpr.12451 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection.Frank Jackson - 1991 - Ethics 101 (3):461-482.
View all 40 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Rehabilitating Statistical Evidence.Lewis Ross - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (1):3-23.
III—Doxastic Wrongs, Non-Spurious Generalizations and Particularized Beliefs.Cécile Fabre - 2022 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 122 (1):47-69.
Learning to Discriminate: The Perfect Proxy Problem in Artificially Intelligent Criminal Sentencing.Benjamin Davies & Thomas Douglas - forthcoming - In Jesper Ryberg & Julian V. Roberts (eds.), Sentencing and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
View all 7 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Racial Profiling and Background Injustice.Paul Bou-Habib - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):33 - 46.
Exchange: Racial and Ethnic Profiling.Mathias Risse, Annabelle Lever & Michael Levin - 2007 - Criminal Justice Ethics 26 (1):3-35.
Race and Racial Profiling.Annabelle Lever - 2017 - In Naomi Zack (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race. NEW YORK: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-435.
What's Wrong with Racial Profiling? Another Look at the Problem.Annabelle Lever - 2007 - Criminal Justice Ethics 26 (1):20-28.
Why Racial Profiling Is Hard to Justify: A Response to Risse and Zeckhauser.Annabelle Lever - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1):94-110.
Review Essay / The “P” Word: Profiling.Fedwa Malti‐Douglas - 2002 - Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):66-73.
The Art of the Unseen: Three Challenges for Racial Profiling.Frej Klem Thomsen - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):89 - 117.
Racial Profiling and the Presumption of Innocence.Peter DeAngelis - 2014 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy (1):43-58.
Racial Profiling and Criminal Justice.Jesper Ryberg - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):79 - 88.
White Privilege and Black Rights: The Injustice of U.S. Police Racial Profiling and Homicide.Naomi Zack - 2015 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Genetic Profiling: Ethical Constraints Upon Criminal Investigation Procedures.Michael Boylan - 2007 - Politics and Ethics Review 3 (2):236-252.
Genetic Profiling: Ethical Constraints Upon Criminal Investigation Procedures.Michael Boylan - 2007 - Journal of International Political Theory 3:236-252.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-10-06
Total views
124 ( #94,255 of 2,506,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,990 of 2,506,442 )
2017-10-06
Total views
124 ( #94,255 of 2,506,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,990 of 2,506,442 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads