The Unabomber’s ethics

Bioethics 33 (2):223-229 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I present and criticize Ted Kaczynski’s (“The Unabomber”) theory that industrialization has been terrible for humanity, and that we should use any means necessary, including violent means, to induce a return to pre‐industrial ways of living. Although Kaczynski’s manifesto, Industrial society and its future, has become widely known, his ideas have never before been subject to careful philosophical criticism. In this paper I show how Kaczynski’s arguments rely on a number of highly implausible philosophical premises. I further make the case that, although his theory as a whole should be rejected, Kaczynski raises a number of worries about technological development that ought to receive serious attention. Some of these worries have recently come to be shared by prominent defenders of human enhancement, including Nick Bostrom and Julian Savulescu. In the last section I indicate why I believe it is important that academic philosophers scrutinize ideas that motivate acts of violence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,362

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is considerable life extension an enhancement?R. Rantanen - 2014 - Global Bioethics 25 (2):103-113.
Egalitarianism and Responsibility in the Genetic Future.Linda Barclay - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (2):119-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-24

Downloads
90 (#201,470)

6 months
19 (#136,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ole Martin Moen
University of Oslo

References found in this work

Letter from Utopia.Nick Bostrom - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 19 (1):67-72.

Add more references