No child left behind? A daoist critique of some humanist ideals of education

Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (4):517–528 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00379.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Child development and education: a Piagetian perspective.David Elkind - 1976 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is Daoism ‘green'?David E. Cooper - 1994 - Asian Philosophy 4 (2):119-125.
Advancing the ideas of John Dewey: A look at the high tech schools.Jennifer R. Pieratt - 2010 - Education and Culture 26 (2):52-64.
The progressive education movement: is it still a factor in today's schools?William Hayes - 2006 - Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Humanism and antihumanism in lasch and sandel.Tom Hoffman - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):97-114.
Problematising critique in education and child-rearing: Ruhloff's scepticism.Stefan Ramaekers - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (3):395–407.
A Critique Of Block On Abortion And Child Abandonment.Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski - 2010 - Libertarian Papers 2:16.
Education & children.Sylvia Goodman, Eva Reich, Peter Marin & Stanley Keleman (eds.) - 1974 - [S.l.: [S.N.].

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#344,726)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hans-Georg Moeller
University of Macau

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references