Ideal Theory and Its Fairness Role

Journal of Value Inquiry:1–16 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The debate on ideal theory focuses mainly on whether it can provide a long-term target and a metric for assessing the justice of different institutional arrangements in non-ideal theory. Both critics and defenders of ideal theory typically overlook the role it plays in a model of fairness that can restrict the range of permissible arrangements under non-ideal conditions. In this paper, I explain ideal theory’s fairness role and its part in ensuring an institutional structure that benefits everyone in a society. Critics of ideal theory therefore cannot reject it as simply useless. But I consider how they can question the attractiveness of an ideal-theory-based fairness constraint on non-ideal theory.

Similar books and articles

Making Sense of Full Compliance.Lars J. K. Moen - 2022 - Social Theory and Practice 48 (2):285-308.
Realistic Idealism and Classical Liberalism: Evaluating Free Market Fairness.Mark Pennington - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (3):375-407.
On Fairness and Claims.Patrick Tomlin - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (2):200-213.
Nonideal Justice as Nonideal Fairness.Marcus Arvan - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (2):208-228.
Fairness as Justice.Anthony de Jasay - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (1):13-31.
Fairness. [REVIEW]Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Review of Metaphysics 58 (1):188-190.
Why Strict Compliance?Simon Căbulea May - 2021 - In David Sobel, Steven Wall & Peter Vallentyne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy Volume 7. Oxford University Press. pp. 227-264.


Added to PP

268 (#71,997)

6 months
122 (#27,681)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lars Moen
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Realism in political theory.William A. Galston - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (4):385-411.
Special ties and natural duties.Jeremy Waldron - 1993 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1):3-30.

Add more references