Vincent R. A. Moermans, Angela M. H. J. Mengelers, Michel H. C. Bleijlevens, Hilde Verbeek, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterle, Koen Milisen, Elizabeth Capezuti & Jan P. H. Hamers
Nursing Ethics 29 (2):330-343 (2022)
AbstractBackground: Dementia care at home often involves decisions in which the caregiver must weigh safety concerns with respect for autonomy. These dilemmas can lead to situations where caregivers provide care against the will of persons living with dementia, referred to as involuntary treatment. To prevent this, insight is needed into how family caregivers of persons living with dementia deal with care situations that can lead to involuntary treatment. Objective: To identify and describe family caregivers’ experiences regarding care decisions for situations that can lead to involuntary treatment use in persons living with dementia at home. Research design: A qualitative descriptive interview design. Data were analysed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. Participants and research context: A total of 10 family caregivers providing care for 13 persons living with dementia participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited by registered nurses via purposive sampling. Ethical consideration: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospitals Leuven and the Medical Ethical Test Committee Zuyderland. Findings: Family caregivers experience the decision-making process concerning care dilemmas that can lead to involuntary treatment as complicated, stressful and exhausting. Although they consider safety and autonomy as important values, they struggle with finding the right balance between them. Due to the progressive and unpredictable nature of dementia, they are constantly seeking solutions while they adapt to new situations. Family caregivers feel responsible and experience social pressure for the safety of persons living with dementia. They may be blamed if something adverse happens to the persons living with dementia, which increases an already stressful situation. Their experience is influenced by characteristics of the care triad such as practical and emotional support, knowledge, and previous experiences. Discussion and conclusion: To prevent involuntary treatment, professionals need to proactively inform family caregivers, and they need to support each other in dealing with complex care situations.
Similar books and articles
Dementia, Healthcare Decision Making, and Disability Law.Megan S. Wright - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (S4):25-33.
Making decisions about life-sustaining medical treatment in patients with dementia.Arthur R. Derse - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):55-67.
Practitioner Bias as an Explanation for Low Rates of Palliative Care Among Patients with Advanced Dementia.Meira Erel, Esther-Lee Marcus & Freda Dekeyser-Ganz - 2022 - Health Care Analysis 30 (1):57-72.
The Ethics of Decision Making for the Critically Ill Elderly.Madelyn Anne Iris - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (2):135.
Autonomy, authenticity, or best interest: Everyday decision-making and persons with dementia. [REVIEW]Søren Holm - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):153-159.
The Impact of Respite Programming on Caregiver Resilience in Dementia Care: A Qualitative Examination of Family Caregiver Perspectives.Emily Roberts & Kristopher M. Struckmeyer - 2018 - Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 55:004695801775150.
Unmet needs of caregivers of individuals referred to a dementia care program.D. B. la JenningsReuben, L. C. Evertson, K. S. Serrano, L. Ercoli, J. Grill, J. Chodosh, Z. Tan & N. S. Wenger - unknown
Evaluation of decision-making capacity in patients with dementia: challenges and recommendations from a secondary analysis of qualitative interviews.Christopher Poppe, Bernice S. Elger, Tenzin Wangmo & Manuel Trachsel - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-8.
Ethical deliberations about involuntary treatment: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists.Manne Sjöstrand, Lars Sandman, Petter Karlsson, Gert Helgesson, Stefan Eriksson & Niklas Juth - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-12.
‘Too late or too soon’: The ethics of advance care planning in dementia setting.Marta Perin, Luca Ghirotto & Ludovica De Panfilis - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (2):178-186.
In re Edna MF: Case law confusion in surrogate decision making.Robyn S. Shapiro - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):45-54.
The Re-contextualization of the Patient: What Home Health Care Can Teach Us About Medical Decision-Making.Erica K. Salter - 2015 - HEC Forum 27 (2):143-156.
Dwelling, house and home: towards a home-led perspective on dementia care. [REVIEW]Wim Dekkers - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (3):291-300.
Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology, and Applications.Gretchen B. Chapman & Frank A. Sonnenberg (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Doing the Right Thing: A Geriatrician's Perspective on Medical Care for the Person with Advanced Dementia.Muriel R. Gillick - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):51-56.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
The ethics of coercive treatment of people with dementia.E. Lejman, M. Westerbotn, U. Poder & B. Wadensten - 2013 - Nursing Ethics (3):0969733012463721.
Restraints in daily care for people with moderate intellectual disabilities.Anne Pier S. Van der Meulen, Maaike A. Hermsen & Petri J. C. M. Embregts - 2018 - Nursing Ethics 25 (1):54-68.