Man-Made Morals [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 22 (4):759-760 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marnell studies the fortunes of the belief that society's moral foundations are man-made. In England and America this belief has "crested four times in the past three hundred years, and receded three." Deism, utilitarianism, social Darwinism, and pragmatism are the crests. About half the book's length consists of sketches of nearly fifty adherents of these philosophies--their birth and training, their views and influence on the movements, and excerpts from their work. The philosophical expositions are reliable. Moreover, the book is thick with detail and very lively, both because its subject is the philosophy of essentially active people, and because of its style. Thus the reader is propelled along by colorful, epigrammatic prose. It should be a popular assignment as background reading in American civilization or philosophy, or the history of ideas. There are notes, bibliographical notes, and an index. In the final chapter Marnell examines the relationship between "progress," "liberalism," and the belief in a man-made order. Each man-centered philosophy has started as a reform movement, but has degenerated into cynicism and an excuse for self-aggrandizement, he tells us. Then, "believers in the divinely created order have found the way around to the fertile plain where progress once more is possible." Pursuing the current good cause, liberals have shifted philosophical positions three times in the past one hundred years. Currently, civil rights arguments rely on a natural law position ultimately based on divine rather than man-made order. The author makes a case for at least alternating emphasis on human and divine order, as the condition for social betterment.--M. B. M.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Man-made morals.William H. Marnell - 1966 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Doubleday.
Man and morals.D. J. B. Hawkins - 1961 - New York,: Sheed & Ward.
What a Scholastic Philosopher Has Found in “What Man Has Made of Man”.Peter E. Nolan - 1938 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 13 (2):299-302.
Man and Morals. [REVIEW]Linus McManaman - 1962 - New Scholasticism 36 (2):261-263.
Man and Morals. [REVIEW]L. Ryan - 1961 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 11:333-333.
What Man Has Made of Man.Robert J. Slavin - 1938 - New Scholasticism 12 (1):97-99.
Man and Morals. [REVIEW]Austin Fagothey - 1962 - Modern Schoolman 39 (4):409-410.
Why a genealogy of morals?Debra B. Bergoffen - 1983 - Man and World 16 (2):129-138.
Morals by agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Morals and Man. [REVIEW]Sister Mary William Hollenbach - 1962 - New Scholasticism 36 (1):106-108.
Morals and Man in the Social Sciences. [REVIEW]Joseph P. Fitzpatrick - 1953 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 28 (1):102-104.
An essay on morals for modern man.Richard Carl Spurney - 1970 - Berkeley, Calif.,: Publication Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
9 (#1,228,347)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references