Confucianism as Anthropological Machine

Asian Philosophy 20 (2):127-140 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Confucianism is a kind of humanism. Confucian humanism presupposes, however, a divisive act that separates human and nonhuman. This paper shows that the split between the human and the nonhuman is central to Mencius' moral psychology, and it argues that Confucianism is an anthropological machine in the sense of the term used by Giorgio Agamben. I consider the main points of early Daoist critique of Confucian humanism. A comparative analysis of Herman Melville's novella 'Bartleby the Scrivener' reveals the limitation of the moral will in Mencius. Finally, I refer to an incident that recently captured the imagination of Chinese netizens, and shows the contested influence of Confucian humanism in contemporary China

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Humanist Way in Ancient China.Chʻu Chai - 1965 - New York: Bantam Books.
Is tu Wei-Ming confucian?Eske Møllgaard - 2007 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):397-411.
Why Early Confucianism Cannot Generate Democracy.David Elstein - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):427-443.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-11

Downloads
21 (#543,512)

6 months
1 (#451,971)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eske Møllgaard
University of Rhode Island

References found in this work

A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mencius.D. C. Lau - 1984 - Penguin Classics.
The Open: Man and Animal.Giorgio Agamben - 2003 - Stanford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references