New Puzzles About Divine Attributes

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):147-157 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to traditional Western theism, God is maximally great (or perfect). More explicitly, God is said to have the following divine attributes: omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence. In this paper, I present three puzzles about this conception of a maximally great (or perfect) being. The first puzzle about omniscience shows that this divine attribute is incoherent. The second puzzle about omnibenevolence and omnipotence shows that these divine attributes are logically incompatible. The third puzzle about perfect rationality and omnipotence shows that these divine attributes are logically incompatible.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The divine attributes.Nicholas Everitt - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):78-90.
Omniscience and maximal power.Thomas Metcalf - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (3):289-306.
Gersonides: Judaism within the limits of reason.Seymour Feldman - 2010 - Portland, Or.: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
On Two Alleged Conflicts Between Divine Attributes.Torin Alter - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (1):47-57.
Omnipotence.Graham Oppy - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):58–84.
New perspectives on old-time religion.George N. Schlesinger - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is God an abstract object?Brian Leftow - 1990 - Noûs 24 (4):581-598.
The Concept of God.Thomas V. Morris (ed.) - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Back to Eternalism.Katherin Rogers - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):320-338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-19

Downloads
2,884 (#2,439)

6 months
161 (#17,239)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Moti Mizrahi
Florida Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

Atheism and Dialetheism; or, ‘Why I Am Not a (Paraconsistent) Christian’.Zach Weber - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (2):401-407.
More in Defense of Weak Scientism.Moti Mizrahi - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (4):7-25.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
What is it Like to be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
God, freedom, and evil.Alvin Plantinga - 1978 - Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Does God Have a Nature?Alvin Plantinga - 1980 - Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
God, Freedom, and Evil.Alvin Plantinga - 1978 - Religious Studies 14 (3):407-409.

View all 27 references / Add more references