Missing Out On the Radicalism of Neurophenomenology?

Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):368-370 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Never Mind the Gap: Neurophenomenology, Radical Enactivism, and the Hard Problem of Consciousness” by Michael D. Kirchhoff & Daniel D. Hutto. Upshot: An exegetical worry about Kirchhoff and Hutto’s exposition of neurophenomenology is pointed out. Combining this exegetical critique with an examination of the “strict identity” in the strict identity thesis, I argue that there is more affinity between neurophenomenology and REC than they think.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Too Often Overlooked Radicality of Neurophenomenology.M. Bitbol & E. Antonova - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):354-356.
Crossing the Explanatory Gap by Legwork, not by Fiat.M. Beaton - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):364-366.
Identity or Dynamic Structure?S. Gallagher - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):363-364.
Not-Quite-So Radical Enactivism.D. Lloyd - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):361-363.
Closing the gap? Some questions for neurophenomenology.Tim Bayne - 2004 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):349-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-17

Downloads
25 (#542,984)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katsunori Miyahara
Hokkaido University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references